Pakistan risks US sanctions over Iran pipeline

WASHINGTON: Pakistan risks sparking US sanctions if it pursues its plans with Iran to build a $7.5 billion gas pipeline linking the two nations, a senior US official said in a renewed warning Monday.

“We have serious concerns, if this project actually goes forward, that the Iran Sanctions Act would be triggered,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said.

“We’ve been straight up with the Pakistanis about these concerns.”

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched the construction of a much-delayed section of the gas pipeline with his Pakistani counterpart Asif Ali Zardari at a ceremony on the border of the two neighbours.

But Nuland added: “We’ve heard this pipeline announced about 10 or 15 times before in the past. So we have to see what actually happens.”

The United States had been seeking alternative plans, saying the move with Iran would take it “in the wrong direction right at a time that we’re trying to work with Pakistan on better, more reliable ways to meet its energy needs.”

Nuland said the US was “supporting large-scale energy projects in Pakistan that will add some 900 megawatts to the power grid by the end of 2013.” Those projects included renovating the power plants at Tarbela, the Mangla Dam, as well as modernising others plants and building new dams at Satpara and Gomal Zam, she added.

Iranian state television showed footage of Ahmadinejad and Zardari shaking hands and offering prayers after unveiling a plaque to mark Pakistan’s involvement.

“The completion of the pipeline is in the interests of peace, security and progress of the two countries … it will also consolidate the economic, political and security ties of the two nations,” the two presidents said in a joint statement.

Pakistan has pursued the pipeline scheme as a way of alleviating severe energy shortages that have sparked demonstrations and battered a weak government. At the same time, it badly needs the billions of dollars it receives in US aid.

“The Pakistani government wants to show it is willing to take foreign policy decisions that defy the US, particularly when such crucial issues as energy security are at stake,” said Anthony Skinner, a director of British-based Maplecroft risks consultancy.

“The pipeline not only caters to Pakistan’s energy needs, but also lodges brownie points with the many critics of the US amongst the electorate,” he told Reuters.

Iran has completed 900 km (560 miles) of pipeline on its side of the border and Iranian contractors will also construct the pipeline in Pakistan, Iran’s national broadcasting network IRIB reported.

Tehran has agreed to lend Islamabad $500 million, or a third of the estimated $1.5 billion cost of the 750-km (470-mile) Pakistani section of the pipeline, Fars news agency reported.

The two sides hope the pipeline will be completed in time to start delivery of 21.5 million cubic metres (760,000 million cubic feet) of gas per day to Pakistan by December 2014.

The project faces security challenges posed by ethnic Baloch militants who have demanded greater control over Balochistan’s natural resources and by Iranian Sunni insurgents also based in Pakistan who are fighting for greater rights in Iran.

“Having a pipeline running through the region makes it particularly vulnerable to bombings and disruption,” said Skinner.

“Washington could bolster its support for local elements, causing significant disruption to pipeline infrastructure,” he added.


Published by

usman hashmi

#Writer #Blogger #Artist #Enterpuner #CivilEngineer #Chealsea #PSPFAMILY #SMT #Twitter #CTH #PSP #SM

8 thoughts on “Pakistan risks US sanctions over Iran pipeline”

  1. If Pakistan and other countries want to take control of their energy needs, can’t we (U.S.) just leave, and spend our billions on our own alternative energy sources? Don’t aid dollars just keep people dependent on U.S.? That does not seem very fair. I’m sorry I do not know the facts, but this looks to me like a country trying to help themselves, and a bigger country (mine) trying to bully them indebted. I will try to learn more. Thank you.

  2. Hey again, Usman. I’m going through another spree of reading your posts….

    Here’s my take on this issue. I don’t have an opinion in regards to the regional political details, as I haven’t done much research, but in global terms I’m a supporter of Iran since it’s a staunch opponent of the US, so if it benefits Iranian infrastructure and industry then I like it. And I think it’s a wise choice on Pakistan’s part, for all the reasons in the article but also because the US aid money and associated construction projects likely come with caveats that will support global conglomerates for the contracts instead of local and semi-local workers and organizations. Also, the US is running trillions in deficits, so I think it would make sense for Washington to redirect the Pakistani aid money elsewhere.

    But, on the other hand, there’s the security issues, and not just those described in the article. Iran is walking a diplomatic tightrope right now, and if it falls and ends up in a military conflict (say, a UN coalition), that could jeopardize Pakistani interests as well, especially if the Pakistani economy becomes dependent on Iranian natural gas supplies. Also, the US-supported alternative solutions involve investment in hydroelectric power, which would be a bonus insofar as reducing fossil fuel use.

    What do you think about it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s