Britain loses latest battle to deport cleric Abu Qatada

LONDON: The British government on Wednesday vowed not to give up its fight to deport radical cleric Abu Qatada to Jordan after losing its latest court challenge to have him expelled.

Lawyers for Home Secretary Theresa May lost their appeal against a decision by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in November to allow the Jordanian to stay in Britain.

Three judges at the Court of Appeal acknowledged that ministers believed Abu Qatada to be an “exceptionally high risk terrorist” but said this was not relevant to their considerations.

The Home Office or interior ministry vowed to keep fighting, saying in a statement on Twitter: “This is not the end of the road. The government remains determined to deport Abu Qatada.”

It said ministers planned to seek leave to appeal, further dragging out a case that has been a thorn in the side of successive British governments for the last decade.

Abu Qatada meanwhile remains in custody. He was released on bail following November’s decision, but was sent back to jail earlier this month for breaching the conditions of his release.

The 52-year-old cleric, whose real name is Omar Mohammed Othman, has been convicted in Jordan in his absence of terrorism offences and is likely to face a retrial if and when he is sent back.

But he has successfully fought off attempts at deportation since 2005 by arguing that his human rights would be violated on his return.

In November, SIAC ruled there was a real risk that evidence obtained through torture would be used against Abu Qatada in any retrial, which it said would be a “flagrant denial of justice”.

It upheld a similar European Court of Human Rights decision in January last year, despite assurances given to the British government by Jordan that the cleric would not be ill-treated.

Government lawyers were given leave to appeal November’s decision but only on a point of law and the judges said on Wednesday they had failed to prove that SIAC had failed to follow correct procedure.

“We are satisfied that SIAC did not commit any legal errors. This appeal must therefore be dismissed,” the ruling said.

The judges acknowledged ministers’ frustration, but said: “The fact that Mr Othman is considered to be a dangerous terrorist is not relevant to the issues that are raised on this appeal.”

The Home Office said it would consider the ruling carefully and plan to seek leave to appeal.

“In the meantime we continue to work with the Jordanians to address the outstanding legal issues preventing Abu Qatada’s deportation.”

In a hearing on March 11, government lawyers argued that SIAC had taken an “erroneous” view of the situation in Jordan, insisting the constitution there clearly banned the use of evidence obtained through torture.

But Abu Qatada’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald argued there was “concrete and compelling evidence” that Abu Qatada’s co-defendants were tortured into providing statements.

The cleric, who first arrived in Britain in 1993 claiming asylum, was once branded the right-hand man in Europe of Osama bin Laden, although he denies ever having met the late Al-Qaeda leader.

Britain initially detained Abu Qatada in 2002 under anti-terror laws imposed in the wake of the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001, and he has been in and out of jail ever since.

The cleric was released under house arrest in November but sent back to jail on March 9 accused of breaching his bail conditions.

A subsequent bail hearing on March 21 was postponed after police said they needed more time to scrutinise documents found during a search of his London home.


Published by

usman hashmi

#Writer #Blogger #Artist #Enterpuner #CivilEngineer #Chealsea #PSPFAMILY #SMT #Twitter #CTH #PSP #SM

8 thoughts on “Britain loses latest battle to deport cleric Abu Qatada”

  1. He is safely ensconced in the public eye of this nation, his hands and mind are bound. It is expensive, this case, but a reassuring reiteration of British adherence to the time honoured tradition of law. An example to the USA about not bending the rules, enough scandal has broken regarding accusations of torture, or wrong arrest, from the special relationship’s hands. Freedom of speech is just that and this is just an example of the extremities a nation must suffer to uphold this intrinsic right . He is doing this country a favour by identifying the extremities of feeling within a religion, and example of how not to think. He can stay as long as he wants, he could never walk the street safely, he cannot preach effectively, he highlights the incorrect justice systems that international governments struggle with. The result in years to come will be freer and fairer extradition arrangements, openness from international justice. Its no waste of money, new law procedures are being made.

    Very good article sir.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s